Heidi Synnøve Bjerkholt Bodal

• Bodal, Heidi Synnøve Bjerkholt & Pihlstrøm, Siri Anne (2015). Bli kjent med biblioteket ditt gjennom tall. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Bodal, Heidi (2014). Bli kjent med biblioteket ditt gjennom tall. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Bodal, Heidi & Torvund, Tove (2014). IKT i lærerutdanning - hvordan kan den styrkes? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Bodal, Heidi (2011). Med tall som argument! Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Boger, Torunn Skofsrud & Bodal, Heidi (2010). Infojakten - jakten på informasjonskompetanse for elever i grunnskolen. Norsklæreren. ISSN 0332-7264. s. 54–55. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Bodal, Heidi & Boger, Torunn Skofsrud (2010). Infojakten: dataverktøy for informasjonsinnhenting. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Bodal, Heidi (2009). Referanseteknikk og opphavsrett. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Bodal, Heidi Synnøve Bjerkholt & Pharo, Nils (2021). Forskningens synlighet: en undersøkelse i bruk av ulike indikatorer og verktøy for å måle forskningens synlighet. OsloMet - storbyuniversitetet. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  The aim of this master’s thesis is to investigate how the use of a various set of indicators and tools can measure the visibility of research, and to explore bibliometric methods within different subject categories for this purpose. The research question is as follows: How can the visibility of research be measured with citation counts and attention in social media and networks? My dataset consist 550 scientific articles reported to the Norwegian Scientific Index (NVI) for the years 2016-2019 within the scientific fields: earth sciences, education and educational research and public, environmental and occupational health. The sources of citation data such as Web of Science, Scopus, Dimensions and Google Scholar has been compared for differences within citation counts, and the altmetric providers Altmetric.com and PlumX has been compared for differences within altmetrics. Results show that Almetric.com has the best coverage of tweets, blogs and news, while PlumX has the best coverage of facebook and Mendeley readers. Results show that Dimensions might serve as a good alternative to Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar is the most comprehensive source for citation data. Further research to examine the relationship between followers to a Twitter account, the number of Mendeley readers and citations is recommended to gain a deeper understanding for this type of analyzes.

Se alle arbeider i NVA